Science Spotlight

Station RN86


Researcher: Jobie Carlisle
Utah State University


RN86 was built on a special 3-meter tower because snow levels at this site are regularly greater than 2 meters.


Name: WASATCH
State: UT
Country: United States
Elevation: 2590.7 m
Lat/Long:  41.8649 / -111.5025

Snow measurements in the Rocky Mountains

We live in a semi-arid environment where water is limited and the population is growing rapidly. Most of our water comes from wintertime precipitation, which at higher elevations is in the form of snow that accumulates to considerable depths. By the end of winter, snow water equivalent—the amount of water produced if you could melt the snowpack instantaneously—can reach 1.5m in many intermountain west montane areas. This snowpack is the water reservoir that provides growing season water for agriculture as well as water for human consumption. Two critical factors that affect water availability are snow accumulation, and snowmelt dynamics. These processes are affected by among other things vegetation type and soil properties. Our research at T.W. Daniels Experimental Forest (TWDEF) is designed to better understand how native vegetation and soil properties affect snowmelt infiltration and soil water storage.

RN86 was installed to validate the GPS technique for measuring snow depth. While initial snow results from 2 other sites were very successful, neither site had any trees. This site was deliberately chosen because it is surrounded by trees. This makes it difficult for the GPS receiver to track the reflected signal. Because snow levels regularly reach 2 meters in this region, this particular GPS antenna was built to be 3 meters above the ground. You can see the solar panels that power the GPS system in the background.

It can be difficult to validate any new measurement system. At this site we have used multiple ways to do it. The best way to validate the system is to make manual measurements of snow depth in the same footprint as the GPS. This is what is shown in Figure 1. A second way to validate the system is to compare it with a nearby sensor operated by the SNOTEL network (locations are shown in Figure 3). Since snowfall is spatially variable, differences are to be expected. A correlation plot (Figure 4) shows that the SNOTEL site always has more snow than the GPS site. This highlights one of the challenges of snow monitoring. There can be significant differences in snow cover for sites that are fairly close together depending on whether they are on northern slopes or in protected areas. If we are to accurately predict how much water we can expect to extract from snow in the mountains, it is important to quantify and understand these differences.

Snowmelt movie (mp4 format)

This site was installed by UNAVCO with funding provided by NSF EAR 0948957.

Figure 1. Snow depth measured for the 2011-2012 water year. Manual measurements (red) agree well with the GPS.


Figure 3. RN86 (shown in blue) is about 400 meters from a SNOTEL sensor (shown in red).


Figure 5. The GPS station complements other research projects being conducted at the site, such as snow sampling.

 

Figure 2. Photo of RN86 taken in February 2012.


Figure 4. This plot compares SNOTEL and GPS measurements of snow depth for 2011/2012 water year. If the systems agreed perfectly they would plot along the diagonal line.

Spotlight Questions

  • Why do you think the SNOTEL-measured snow depth is always deeper than the RN86 snow depth?

Last modified: 2019-12-26  16:24:50  America/Denver  

 

Please send comments and corrections to educationunavco.org.

Copyright © 2012 - 2022 UNAVCO and the GPS Reflections Research Group.
All Rights Reserved.

Funding and Acknowledgements.